CEPRIS

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Naslovna
  • O nama
    • Ko čini CEPRIS?
    • Saradnici CEPRIS-a
    • “Slučaj CEPRIS”
    • Statut CEPRIS-a
    • Program Centra za pravosudna istraživanja
  • Aktivnosti
    • Stručni skupovi
    • Edukacija
    • Istraživanja i Analize
    • Projekat “All Eyes on Justice”
    • Projekat “Deset rasprava o pravosuđu”
  • Vesti
    • Najnovije vesti
    • Reakcije
    • CEPRIS u Medijima
    • Lični stavovi
    • Stav CEPRIS-a
  • Događaji
  • Podcast
  • Pravosuđe u slikama
  • Kontakt
  • Kako se finansiramo?
You are here: Home / Istraživanja i Analize / Judicial Self-governance and Judicial Culture in Serbia

Judicial Self-governance and Judicial Culture in Serbia

In this paper, dr. Tanasije Marinkovic, full Professor of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law examines the extent to which the High Council of Judiciary, part of the Serbian legal and political system since 2001, has profiled itself as a protector of judicial independence and professionalism, and what are the challenges to it.

Jul 22, 2022 CEPRIS

The 2021 – 2022 Constitutional Reform in Serbia was publicly advocated and justified with the argument of protecting the Serbian judiciary and Prosecutor’s Office from excessive influence of the political branches of government.

The primary focus was on the status and powers of the High Council of Judiciary and of its prosecutorial pendent, as well as the composition and functioning of the bodies of the magistrates’ self-governance and the methods of their members’ appointment.

That public debate confirms the importance of these bodies and at the same time shows that the Serbian epistemic community has the correct perception of them as being quintessential for the establishment and preservation of judges ’independence and prosecutors’ autonomy.

In this paper, dr. Tanasije Marinkovic, full Professor of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law examines the extent to which the High Council of Judiciary, part of the Serbian legal and political system since 2001, has profiled itself as a protector of judicial independence and professionalism, and what are the challenges to it.

The paper is divided into following sections: Brief History of Judicial Self-Governance in Serbia (2); Legal and Political Nature of the High Judicial Council – the Barrier and the Bridge of the Judiciary to the other
Branches of Government (3); Organization of the High Council of Judiciary (4); Powers of the High Council of Judiciary (5); Concluding Remarks (6); Policy Recommendations (7)

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download the full document. [670.02 KB]

September 2021

Research: Judicial Culture and the Role of Judges in Developing the Law in Serbia – Conclusions and Recommendation

July 2022

Judicial Self-governance and Judicial Culture in Serbia

October 2022

(In)Consistent Application of the Law and Judicial Culture in Serbia

Related

Ostavite komentar Odustani od odgovora

Vaša email adresa neće biti objavljena. Obavezna polja su prikazana sa zvezdicom *

CEPRIS

Nevladina organizacija za proučavanje, istraživanje i obuku u pravosuđu

Beograd, Njegoševa 22
tel:011/451 3051
info@cepris.org

Newsletter

Najnoviji tekstovi

  • Sofija Mandić: Ko danas nije ovde
  • Savo Đurđić: Zahtevamo zaštitu tužiteljki i bolje pravosuđe
  • Razrešenje tužioca Stefanovića ili nastavak protesta
  • Novi mehanizmi (ne)skrivenih uticaja na pravosuđe
  • Petrović Škero: Vučićeva izjava o ‘hajci’ jeste pritisak
  • CEPRIS podržava javno okupljanje protiv pritisaka na pravosuđe
  • Reformska bajka i slučaj tužiteljke Savović
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Podrži rad Ceprisa

Stranice:

  • Centar za pravosudna istraživanja
  • “Slučaj CEPRIS”
  • CEPRIS u medijima
  • Događaji
  • Ko čini CEPRIS?
  • Kontakt
  • Lični stavovi
  • Najnovije vesti
  • Podcast
  • Reakcije
  • Stav CEPRIS-a
  • Projekat “All Eyes on Justice”

CEPRIS Copyright © 2023 · Log in