Foto:CEPRIS
The scope of this analysis is primarily the procedural aspect of the amendment and enactment of the laws on the judiciary, from the moment of the appointment of the Ministry of Justice’s working groups for the preparation of draft laws on the judiciary. The analysis follows the dynamics and content of the work and the method of decision-making, with a special focus on whether and how the Ministry of Justice communicated this to the public.
In the analysis of the procedure for amending and enacting those laws, the process of public discussion and public hearings was considered (how many there were, who participated in them, if they were sufficiently open and inclusive, what the content and result of those discussions was), and the phase when the draft laws were sent to the Venice Commission (what it stated in its opinion and whether it was respected).
The analysis also includes the discussion of the draft bills in the National Assembly, in particular, whether there were any amendments, how many MPs voted for them, whether the deadlines were respected and, in general, an assessment of the duration and quality of the entire process.
Ostavite komentar